The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose

Jeffrey R. Reimers; Laura K. McKemmish; Ross H. McKenzie; Alan E. Mark; Noel S. Hush

doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose

Jeffrey R. Reimers^*, Laura K. McKemmish, Ross H. McKenzie, Alan E. Mark, Noel S. Hush

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	101-103
Number of pages	3
Journal	Physics of Life Reviews
Volume	11
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003
Publication status	Published - Mar 2014

Access to Document

10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

Cite this

Reimers, J. R., McKemmish, L. K., McKenzie, R. H., Mark, A. E., & Hush, N. S. (2014). The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

@article{c31b979e0337471c85f8fff7118f8342,

title = "The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on {"}Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory{"} by Hameroff and Penrose",

author = "Reimers, \{Jeffrey R.\} and McKemmish, \{Laura K.\} and McKenzie, \{Ross H.\} and Mark, \{Alan E.\} and Hush, \{Noel S.\}",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "101--103",

journal = "Physics of Life Reviews",

issn = "1571-0645",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "1",

}

Reimers, JR, McKemmish, LK, McKenzie, RH, Mark, AE & Hush, NS 2014, 'The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose', Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose. / Reimers, Jeffrey R.; McKemmish, Laura K.; McKenzie, Ross H. et al.
In: Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 11, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 101-103.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified

T2 - Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose

AU - Reimers, Jeffrey R.

AU - McKemmish, Laura K.

AU - McKenzie, Ross H.

AU - Mark, Alan E.

AU - Hush, Noel S.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84895138178

U2 - 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.003

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1571-0645

VL - 11

SP - 101

EP - 103

JO - Physics of Life Reviews

JF - Physics of Life Reviews

IS - 1

ER -

The revised Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective-reduction proposal for human consciousness is not scientifically justified: Comment on "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory" by Hameroff and Penrose

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this