The Rhetorical Standards of Public Reason in Australia

Ryan Walter, John Uhr

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Our article examines recent Australian political speech to discover rhetorical standards for deliberation. Unlike philosophical standards for public reason - such as those developed by Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls - rhetorical standards are not anchored in reason, but in the institutional and linguistic constraints of partisan political speech. Accordingly, rhetorical standards are unwritten, malleable, and permissive. Two standards are apparent. The first is that political parties should not be influenced by factions or vested interests, but must serve the national interest, even as the meaning of that idea is acknowledged to be open to divergent interpretations. The second standard relates to individual politicians, and it prohibits officeholders from acting on the basis of religious beliefs. Both standards can be invoked to attack the reasoning and actions of rival politicians and parties, but both standards also offer generous resources for legitimation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)248-262
    Number of pages15
    JournalAustralian Journal of Politics and History
    Volume61
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Rhetorical Standards of Public Reason in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this