The role of state law in protecting human subjects of public health research and practice

Scott Burris; Lance Gable; Lesley Stone; Zita Lazzarini

doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x

The role of state law in protecting human subjects of public health research and practice

Scott Burris, Lance Gable, Lesley Stone, Zita Lazzarini

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

State public health codes were reviewed to determine whether they protect human subjects of public health practice, and were found to provide protection that is analogous but not identical to that conferred by the Common Rule. These findings suggest it would not be unreasonable to categorically exempt public health agencies from the Common Rule.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	654-662
Number of pages	9
Journal	Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume	31
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x
Publication status	Published - 2003
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x

Cite this

@article{f64e09387d29478ca2749ac33dddf2a9,

title = "The role of state law in protecting human subjects of public health research and practice",

abstract = "State public health codes were reviewed to determine whether they protect human subjects of public health practice, and were found to provide protection that is analogous but not identical to that conferred by the Common Rule. These findings suggest it would not be unreasonable to categorically exempt public health agencies from the Common Rule.",

author = "Scott Burris and Lance Gable and Lesley Stone and Zita Lazzarini",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "654--662",

journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",

issn = "1073-1105",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of state law in protecting human subjects of public health research and practice

AU - Burris, Scott

AU - Gable, Lance

AU - Stone, Lesley

AU - Lazzarini, Zita

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - State public health codes were reviewed to determine whether they protect human subjects of public health practice, and were found to provide protection that is analogous but not identical to that conferred by the Common Rule. These findings suggest it would not be unreasonable to categorically exempt public health agencies from the Common Rule.

AB - State public health codes were reviewed to determine whether they protect human subjects of public health practice, and were found to provide protection that is analogous but not identical to that conferred by the Common Rule. These findings suggest it would not be unreasonable to categorically exempt public health agencies from the Common Rule.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/1542715361

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00132.x

M3 - Article

SN - 1073-1105

VL - 31

SP - 654

EP - 662

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

IS - 4

ER -

The role of state law in protecting human subjects of public health research and practice

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this