The Rule of Law between England and Sudan: Hay, Thompson, and Massoud

Martin Krygier*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two significant writings, one by Douglas Hay and the other by E. P. Thompson, appeared in 1976. Both sought to explain relationships between law and social (specifically, ruling-class) power in a manner that avoided treating law either simply as a coercive instrument of class domination ("vulgar Marxism"), or as a good for all "(liberal legalism"). They overlapped and each was influenced by the other, but they differed significantly, in substance, in tone, and in admirers. Mark Massoud sensibly and thoughtfully draws inspiration from both. This article queries, however, whether his account of the role and rule of law in Sudan manages to resolve a significant tension between Hay and Thompson. This results in a certain ambivalence in the telling, a sometimes anguished oscillation between two interpretive modes, perhaps sensibilities, represented by Hay and Thompson, each of which can lead in different directions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)480-488
Number of pages9
JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Rule of Law between England and Sudan: Hay, Thompson, and Massoud'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this