Abstract
The basic idea of Birch's analysis is plausible: normative guidance began in agents' assessment of their own craft skills. But I suggest developing that idea in a different way. I suggest that proto-normative affect plays its guiding role diachronically, in the development of those skills, rather than synchronically, in modulating their moment-by-moment execution. More importantly, I suggest a different pathway to normative affect's direction at second and third parties. Normative response became social in the context of skilled collaborative activities, for in those activities others' failures have material consequences for each agent. In such collaborations, all have reason to care about others' skill, or lack of it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 225-234 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Analyse und Kritik |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2021 |