The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines

Danielle Barth; Nicholas Evans; Sonja Gipper; Stefan Schnell; Henrik Bergqvist; Mengistu Amberber; I Wayan Arka; Christian Doehler; Diana Forker; Volker Gast; Dolgor Guntsetseg; Gabrielle Hodge; Eri Kashima; Yukinori Kimoto; Norikazu Kogura; Dominique Knuchel; Inge Kral; Keita Kurabe; John Mansfield; Heiko Narrog; Desak Putu Eka Pratiwi; Hiroki Nomoto; Seongha Rhee; Alan Rumsey; Lila San Roque; Andrea C. Schalley; Asako Shiohara; Elena Skribnik; Olena Tykhostup; Saskia van Putten; Yanti

doi:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines

Danielle Barth^*, Nicholas Evans, Sonja Gipper, Stefan Schnell, Henrik Bergqvist, Mengistu Amberber, I Wayan Arka, Christian Doehler, Diana Forker, Volker Gast, Dolgor Guntsetseg, Gabrielle Hodge, Eri Kashima, Yukinori Kimoto, Norikazu Kogura, Dominique Knuchel, Inge Kral, Keita Kurabe, John Mansfield, Heiko NarrogDesak Putu Eka Pratiwi, Hiroki Nomoto, Seongha Rhee, Alan Rumsey, Lila San Roque, Andrea C. Schalley, Asako Shiohara , Elena Skribnik, Olena Tykhostup, Saskia van Putten, Yanti

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Featured article › peer-review

Abstract

Our team’s long-term project investigating social cognition in a range of languages is based on a corpus typology approach. We use a set of annotation schemata to code particular instances of language use that we see as indicating some aspect of social cognition. We then compare the amounts and types of instances by language or task participant.
Much careful consideration went into designing annotation schema to look at various domains of social cognition. This set of guidelines de-scribes our eight coding schemata so that our results are interpretable and to make our scientific process open. The guidelines should also pro-vide enough information for people who are not part of the project to code their own language data.

Original language	English
Pages	162-237
Volume	SP12
Specialist publication	Language Documentation and Conservation
DOIs	https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790
Publication status	Published - 26 Nov 2024

Access to Document

http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

Cite this

Barth, D., Evans, N., Gipper, S., Schnell, S., Bergqvist, H., Amberber, M., Arka, I. W., Doehler, C., Forker, D., Gast, V., Guntsetseg, D., Hodge, G., Kashima, E., Kimoto, Y., Kogura, N., Knuchel, D., Kral, I., Kurabe, K., Mansfield, J., ... Yanti (2024). The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines. Language Documentation and Conservation, SP12, 162-237. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

@misc{654b1ef514da40e39932c3607cf9c652,

title = "The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines",

abstract = "Our team{\textquoteright}s long-term project investigating social cognition in a range of languages is based on a corpus typology approach. We use a set of annotation schemata to code particular instances of language use that we see as indicating some aspect of social cognition. We then compare the amounts and types of instances by language or task participant.Much careful consideration went into designing annotation schema to look at various domains of social cognition. This set of guidelines de-scribes our eight coding schemata so that our results are interpretable and to make our scientific process open. The guidelines should also pro-vide enough information for people who are not part of the project to code their own language data.",

author = "Danielle Barth and Nicholas Evans and Sonja Gipper and Stefan Schnell and Henrik Bergqvist and Mengistu Amberber and Arka, {I Wayan} and Christian Doehler and Diana Forker and Volker Gast and Dolgor Guntsetseg and Gabrielle Hodge and Eri Kashima and Yukinori Kimoto and Norikazu Kogura and Dominique Knuchel and Inge Kral and Keita Kurabe and John Mansfield and Heiko Narrog and Pratiwi, {Desak Putu Eka} and Hiroki Nomoto and Seongha Rhee and Alan Rumsey and {San Roque}, Lila and Schalley, {Andrea C.} and Asako Shiohara and Elena Skribnik and Olena Tykhostup and {van Putten}, Saskia and Yanti",

year = "2024",

month = nov,

day = "26",

doi = "http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790",

language = "English",

volume = "SP12",

pages = "162--237",

journal = "Language Documentation and Conservation",

issn = "1934-5275",

publisher = "University of Hawaii Press",

}

Barth, D , Evans, N, Gipper, S, Schnell, S, Bergqvist, H, Amberber, M, Arka, IW, Doehler, C, Forker, D, Gast, V, Guntsetseg, D, Hodge, G, Kashima, E, Kimoto, Y, Kogura, N, Knuchel, D, Kral, I, Kurabe, K, Mansfield, J, Narrog, H, Pratiwi, DPE, Nomoto, H, Rhee, S, Rumsey, A , San Roque, L, Schalley, AC, Shiohara , A, Skribnik, E, Tykhostup, O, van Putten, S & Yanti 2024, 'The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines' Language Documentation and Conservation, vol. SP12, pp. 162-237. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

TY - GEN

T1 - The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines

AU - Barth, Danielle

AU - Evans, Nicholas

AU - Gipper, Sonja

AU - Schnell, Stefan

AU - Bergqvist, Henrik

AU - Amberber, Mengistu

AU - Arka, I Wayan

AU - Doehler, Christian

AU - Forker, Diana

AU - Gast, Volker

AU - Guntsetseg, Dolgor

AU - Hodge, Gabrielle

AU - Kashima, Eri

AU - Kimoto, Yukinori

AU - Kogura, Norikazu

AU - Knuchel, Dominique

AU - Kral, Inge

AU - Kurabe, Keita

AU - Mansfield, John

AU - Narrog, Heiko

AU - Pratiwi, Desak Putu Eka

AU - Nomoto, Hiroki

AU - Rhee, Seongha

AU - Rumsey, Alan

AU - San Roque, Lila

AU - Schalley, Andrea C.

AU - Shiohara , Asako

AU - Skribnik, Elena

AU - Tykhostup, Olena

AU - van Putten, Saskia

AU - Yanti,

PY - 2024/11/26

Y1 - 2024/11/26

N2 - Our team’s long-term project investigating social cognition in a range of languages is based on a corpus typology approach. We use a set of annotation schemata to code particular instances of language use that we see as indicating some aspect of social cognition. We then compare the amounts and types of instances by language or task participant.Much careful consideration went into designing annotation schema to look at various domains of social cognition. This set of guidelines de-scribes our eight coding schemata so that our results are interpretable and to make our scientific process open. The guidelines should also pro-vide enough information for people who are not part of the project to code their own language data.

AB - Our team’s long-term project investigating social cognition in a range of languages is based on a corpus typology approach. We use a set of annotation schemata to code particular instances of language use that we see as indicating some aspect of social cognition. We then compare the amounts and types of instances by language or task participant.Much careful consideration went into designing annotation schema to look at various domains of social cognition. This set of guidelines de-scribes our eight coding schemata so that our results are interpretable and to make our scientific process open. The guidelines should also pro-vide enough information for people who are not part of the project to code their own language data.

U2 - http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

DO - http://hdl.handle.net/10125/74790

M3 - Featured article

SN - 1934-5275

VL - SP12

SP - 162

EP - 237

JO - Language Documentation and Conservation

JF - Language Documentation and Conservation

ER -

The Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) Project Guidelines

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this