Abstract
We often prefer non-deferential belief to deferential belief. In the last twenty years, epistemology has seen a surge of sympathetic interest in testimony as a source of knowledge. We are urged to abandon epistemic individualism and the ideal of the autonomous knower in favour of social epistemology. In this connection, you might think that a preference for non-deferential belief is a manifestation of vicious individualism, egotism, or egoism. I shall call this the selfishness challenge to preferring non-deferential belief. The aim of this paper is to meet the selfishness challenge by arguing that non-deferential belief is (pro tanto) socially valuable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 131-151 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
Volume | 94 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |