The source of ionization along the magellanic stream

Joss Bland-Hawthorn*, Ralph Sutherland, Oscar Agertz, Ben Moore

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    104 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Since its discovery in 1996, the source of the bright Ha emission (up to 750 mR) along the Magellanic Stream has remained a mystery. There is no evidence of ionizing stars within the H I stream, and the extended hot halo is far too tenuous to drive strong shocks into the clouds. We now present a hydrodynamical model that explains the known properties of the Ha emission and provides new insights on the lifetime of the Stream clouds. The upstream clouds are gradually disrupted due to their interaction with the hot halo gas. The clouds that follow plow into gas ablated from the upstream clouds, leading to shock ionization at the leading edges of the downstream clouds. Since the following clouds also experience ablation, and weaker Ha (100-200 mR) is quite extensive, a disruptive cascade must be operating along much of the Stream. In our model, the clouds are evolving on timescales of 100-200 Myr, such that the Stream must be replenished by the Magellanic Clouds at a fairly constant rate. The ablated material falls onto the Galaxy as a warm drizzle, which suggests that diffuse ionized gas at 104 K may be an important constituent of galactic accretion. The observed Ha emission provides a new constraint on the rate of disruption of the Stream and, consequently, the infall rate of metal-poor gas onto the Galaxy. When the ionized component of the Stream is fully accounted for, the rate of gas accretion is 0.4 Modot; yr-1, roughly twice the rate deduced from H i observations alone.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)L109-L112
    JournalAstrophysical Journal
    Volume670
    Issue number2 PART 2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The source of ionization along the magellanic stream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this