Abstract
This paper compares two approaches to analyzing longitudinal discrete-time binary outcomes. Dynamic binary response models focus on state occupancy and typically specify low-order Markovian state dependence. Multi-spell duration models focus on transitions between states and typically allow for state-specific duration dependence. We show that the former implicitly impose strong and testable restrictions on the transition probabilities. In a case study of poverty transitions, we show that these restrictions are severely rejected against the more flexible multi-spell duration models.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1 |
Journal | Econometrics |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |