The temporal welfare state: A crossnational comparison

James Mahmud Rice*, Robert E. Goodin, Antti Parpo

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Welfare states contribute to people's well-being in many different ways. Bringing all these contributions under a common metric is tricky. Here we propose doing so through the notion of temporal autonomy: the freedom to spend one's time as one pleases, outside the necessities of everyday life. Using income and time use surveys from five countries (the USA, Australia, Germany, France, and Sweden) that represent the principal types of welfare and gender regimes, we propose ways of operationalising the time that is strictly necessary for people to spend in paid labour, unpaid household labour, and personal care. The time people have at their disposal after taking into account what is strictly necessary in these three arenas - which we christen discretionary time - represents people's temporal autonomy. We measure the impact on this of government taxes, transfers, and childcare subsidies in these five countries. In so doing, we calibrate the contributions of the different welfare and gender regimes that exist in these countries, in ways that correspond to the lived reality of people's daily lives.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-228
    Number of pages34
    JournalJournal of Public Policy
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The temporal welfare state: A crossnational comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this