The TPP: Multilateralizing regionalism or the securitization of trade policy?

Ann Capling

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A proliferation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) has been the dominant trend in international trade arrangements since the conclusion of the Uruguay Round (World Trade Organization, 2011a). The expansion in the number of PTAs and the growing share of global trade they cover has caused increasing disquiet among many trade policy officials and academics. The principal anxieties are summarized succinctly in the words of Pascal Lamy, Director-General of the World Trade Organization (WTO): “Proliferation is breeding concern – concern about incoherence, confusion, unnecessary business costs, instability, and unpredictability in trade relations” (Lamy, 2009). Although the WTO itself notes that the evidence of the effects of PTAs on the global trading system are far from being unambiguously negative (World Trade Organization, 2011c), the explosion of preferential agreements raises two principal sets of issues. The first is that PTAs at best distract from liberalization at the global level; at worst, the existence of preferences may hinder or complicate moves towards multilateral liberalization. Second, multiple preferential agreements, with their associated rules of origin, complicate the task of managing global supply chains and have the potential to generate economic inefficiencies; for further discussion see Baldwin (2009).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Trans-Pacific Partnership
Subtitle of host publicationA Quest for a Twenty-First Century Trade Agreement
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages279-298
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781139236775
ISBN (Print)9781107028661
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The TPP: Multilateralizing regionalism or the securitization of trade policy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this