The twists and turns of community participation in natural resource management in Australia: What is missing?

Marlène Buchy*, Digby Race

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aspects of Australian natural resource management, particularly forestry, such as harvesting from public native forests and establishing large-scale plantations on farmland, have been contentious for many years. In response to such contention with forestry development, local communities are increasingly seeking a role in determining the use and management of forest resources. Despite a growing acceptance of the need for community participation, there has been little analysis of the type and extent of participation that is most effective, and of the costs and benefits of participation in natural resource management. This paper draws on international and Australian experiences to provide a conceptual framework for analysing the role of participation in natural resource management, especially forestry. The authors provide three examples of how community participation has been developed in Australia, and aim to stimulate discussion on the wider role of participation in natural resource management.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)293-308
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
    Volume44
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The twists and turns of community participation in natural resource management in Australia: What is missing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this