The two-step australian immigration policy and its impact on immigrant employment outcomes

R. G. Gregory*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Three decades ago, most immigrants to Australia with work entitlements came as permanent settlers. Today the annual allocation of temporary visas, with work entitlements, outnumbers permanent settler visas by a ratio of three to one. The new environment, with so many temporary visa holders, has led to a two-step immigration policy whereby an increasing proportion of immigrants come first as a temporary immigrant, to work or study, and then seek to move to permanent status. Around one-half of permanent visas are allocated onshore to those who hold temporary visas with work rights. The labor market implications of this new two-step system are substantial. Immigrants from non-English-speaking countries (NES) are affected most. In their early years in Australia, they have substantially reduced full-time employment and substantially increased part-time employment, usually while attending an education institution. Three years after arrival, one-third of NES immigrants are now employed part-time which, rather than unemployment, is becoming their principal pathway to full-time labor market integration. Surprisingly, little has changed for immigrants from English-speaking countries (ES).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook of the Economics of International Migration, 2015
    EditorsPaul W. Miller, Barry R. Chiswick
    PublisherElsevier B.V.
    Pages1421-1443
    Number of pages23
    ISBN (Print)9780444633729
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Publication series

    NameHandbook of the Economics of International Migration
    Volume1
    ISSN (Print)2212-0092

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The two-step australian immigration policy and its impact on immigrant employment outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this