The Use and Abuse of “Culture”

Andrew Hopkins*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Culture is a misunderstood and misused idea. In this chapter I advance seven clarifying theses. (1) Culture is a characteristic of a group, not an individual, and talk of culture must always specify the relevant group. (2) Organisations have it within their power to ensure that organisational culture over-rides national cultures. (3) The most useful definition of the culture of a collectivity is its set of collective practices—“the way we do things around here”. (4) In the organisational context, it is usually better to use culture as a description of group behaviour, rather than as an explanation for individual behaviour. (5) Organisational cultures depend on the structures that organisations put in place to achieve desired outcomes. These structures reflect the priorities of top leaders. The priorities of leaders in turn may depend on factors outside the organisation, such as regulatory pressure and public opinion. (6) The distinction between emergent and managerialist views of culture is misleading. (7) The term safety culture is so confusing it should be abandoned.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology
    PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
    Pages35-45
    Number of pages11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Publication series

    NameSpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology
    ISSN (Print)2191-530X
    ISSN (Electronic)2191-5318

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Use and Abuse of “Culture”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this