The use of multiple reference samples for the monitoring of ion microprobe performance during zircon ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb age determinations

Data from a series of extended analytical sessions using a range of different zircon reference samples have been used to investigate the periodic derivation of abnormal ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb ages during microbeam analysis. For the Canberra SHRIMP II, this phenomenon probably results from the presence of a signal at mass 204 that is alien to the Pb spectrum; isotopic fractionation is unlikely to be a significant contributor. In contrast, abnormal ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb ages obtained from SHRIMP I at the same research centre require a different, but as yet unknown explanation. Assessment of the reasons for atypical ²⁰⁷pb/²⁰⁶pb measurements and the means of correcting for them should therefore be independently assessed for individual analytical instruments. The use of reference samples with very different ages is an effective way of doing this, because older reference samples are more useful for documenting isotopic fractionation, whereas younger ones are more sensitive indicators of isobaric interference.