The utility of human security: Sovereignty and humanitarian intervention

Nicholas Thomas*, William T. Tow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'Human security' is a promising but still underdeveloped paradigmatic approach to understanding contemporary security politics. We argue that tension between those embracing the politics of development and those supporting the human security paradigm has intensified because the transnational dimensions embodied within the latter approach have been under-assessed. The idea of 'threat' also needs to be identified with more precision for the human security concept to accrue analytical credibility. We focus on how transnational behaviour addresses the central human security problems of vulnerability and immediacy. Human security's utility for confronting crisis is also evaluated via the application of two case studies of humanitarian intervention: the 1994 multinational operation in Haiti and the 1999 intervention in East Timor. We conclude that, while general security politics includes both domestic and international issues, human security allows us to transcend sovereign prerogatives and to address emerging transregional threats more effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-192
Number of pages16
JournalSecurity Dialogue
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of human security: Sovereignty and humanitarian intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this