TY - JOUR
T1 - 'These Ancient Arenas of Racial Struggles'
T2 - International Law and the Balkans, 1878-1949
AU - Tzouvala, Ntina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/31
Y1 - 2018/12/31
N2 - This article revisits the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire and the emergence of national statehood in the Balkans. It traces this transitional process between the Congress of Berlin in 1878 and the United Nations involvement in the Greek Civil War (1946-1949). I show that this transition from empire to the nation-state was overdetermined by the partial and fragmented, yet influential, internationalization of significant questions regarding state building, including decisions about autonomy and independence, the drawing of boundaries, the protection of minorities and the continuation of economic relations. In fact, the Balkans became a site of experimentation for international legal techniques, such as fact-finding, peacekeeping missions or the administration of population exchanges, that would later acquire wider significance in the process of decolonization. The image of international law emerging from this account troubles the liberal understanding of international law and institutions as benevolent, cosmopolitan forces opposing, restraining and taming 'nationalist passions'. Rather, it was precisely because the relationship between nationalism and internationalism was one of cooperation and co-constitution, as much as one of antagonism, that this multitude of international legal techniques conditioning sovereignty in the Balkans arose.
AB - This article revisits the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire and the emergence of national statehood in the Balkans. It traces this transitional process between the Congress of Berlin in 1878 and the United Nations involvement in the Greek Civil War (1946-1949). I show that this transition from empire to the nation-state was overdetermined by the partial and fragmented, yet influential, internationalization of significant questions regarding state building, including decisions about autonomy and independence, the drawing of boundaries, the protection of minorities and the continuation of economic relations. In fact, the Balkans became a site of experimentation for international legal techniques, such as fact-finding, peacekeeping missions or the administration of population exchanges, that would later acquire wider significance in the process of decolonization. The image of international law emerging from this account troubles the liberal understanding of international law and institutions as benevolent, cosmopolitan forces opposing, restraining and taming 'nationalist passions'. Rather, it was precisely because the relationship between nationalism and internationalism was one of cooperation and co-constitution, as much as one of antagonism, that this multitude of international legal techniques conditioning sovereignty in the Balkans arose.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062690480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ejil/chy067
DO - 10.1093/ejil/chy067
M3 - Review article
SN - 0938-5428
VL - 29
SP - 1149
EP - 1171
JO - European Journal of International Law
JF - European Journal of International Law
IS - 4
ER -