TY - JOUR
T1 - Timor-leste votes
T2 - Parties and patronage
AU - Aspinall, Edward
AU - Hicken, Allen
AU - Scambary, James
AU - Weiss, Meredith
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 National Endowment for Democracy and Johns Hopkins University Press.
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - This article examines electoral politics in the tiny nation of Timor-Leste, one of Southeast Asia's most successful democracies. Focusing on the country’s July 2017 parliamentary elections, it asks why retail forms of electoral clientelism, such as mass-based vote buying, are rarer in Timor-Leste than in several neighboring states, despite its poverty and growing levels of corruption. It argues that Timor-Leste’s electoral system undercuts the appeal of retail clientelism by prioritizing parties rather than candidates, and by encouraging parties to build up their networks and target patronage politics at community-level notables rather than ordinary voters. The result is an alternative model of clientelistic politics shaped by collective ties involving parties, local notables, and state contracts, Moreover, these clientelistic ties, although common, remained on the whole secondary to historical networks in binding voters to politicians.
AB - This article examines electoral politics in the tiny nation of Timor-Leste, one of Southeast Asia's most successful democracies. Focusing on the country’s July 2017 parliamentary elections, it asks why retail forms of electoral clientelism, such as mass-based vote buying, are rarer in Timor-Leste than in several neighboring states, despite its poverty and growing levels of corruption. It argues that Timor-Leste’s electoral system undercuts the appeal of retail clientelism by prioritizing parties rather than candidates, and by encouraging parties to build up their networks and target patronage politics at community-level notables rather than ordinary voters. The result is an alternative model of clientelistic politics shaped by collective ties involving parties, local notables, and state contracts, Moreover, these clientelistic ties, although common, remained on the whole secondary to historical networks in binding voters to politicians.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040722104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/jod.2018.0013
DO - 10.1353/jod.2018.0013
M3 - Article
SN - 1045-5736
VL - 29
SP - 153
EP - 167
JO - Journal of Democracy
JF - Journal of Democracy
IS - 1
ER -