To call or not to call: Parents assess the vulnerability of their young before warning them about predators

Tonya M. Haff*, Robert D. Magrath

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Communication about predators can reveal the effects of both conspecific and heterospecific audiences on signalling strategy, providing insight into signal function and animal cognition. In species that alarm call to their young, parents face a fundamental dilemma: calling can silence noisy offspring and so make them less likely to be overheard, but can also alert predators that young are nearby. Parents could resolve this dilemma by being sensitive to the current vulnerability of offspring, and calling only when young are most at risk. Testing whether offspring vulnerability affects parental strategy has proved difficult, however, because more vulnerable broods are often also more valuable. We tested experimentally whether parent white-browed scrubwren, Sericornis frontalis, assessed brood noisiness when alarm calling near nests. When a model predator was nearby, parents gave more alarm calls when playbacks simulated noisy broods, yet brood noisiness did not affect adult calling when only a control modelwas present. Parentswere therefore sensitive to the tradeoff between silencing young and alerting predators to the presence of nests. Our study demonstrates that receiver vulnerability can affect signalling decisions in species other than primates.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20130745
    JournalBiology Letters
    Volume9
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To call or not to call: Parents assess the vulnerability of their young before warning them about predators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this