To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies

Saul A. Cunningham*, Simon J. Attwood, Kamal S. Bawa, Tim G. Benton, Linda M. Broadhurst, Raphael K. Didham, Sue McIntyre, Ivette Perfecto, Michael J. Samways, Teja Tscharntke, John Vandermeer, Marc André Villard, Andrew G. Young, David B. Lindenmayer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    125 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Increasing yield has emerged as the most prominent element in strategies to deal with growing global demand for food and fibre. It is usually acknowledged that this needs to be done while minimising harm to the environment, but historically land-use intensification has been a major driver of biodiversity loss. The risk is now great that a singular focus on increasing yields will divert attention from the linked problem of biodiversity decline, and the historical pattern will continue. There are options that increase yields while reducing harm to biodiversity, which should be the focus of future strategies. The solutions are not universal, but are locally specific. This is because landscapes vary greatly in inherent biodiversity, the production systems they can support, and the potential for them to be adopted by landholders. While new production techniques might apply at local scale, biodiversity conservation inevitably requires strategies at landscape and larger scales.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)20-27
    Number of pages8
    JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
    Volume173
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this