To Suspend or Not to Suspend: A Qualitative Analysis of Sentencing Decisions in the Supreme Court of Tasmania

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Suspended sentences are a controversial sentencing option currently available in all Australian jurisdictions. This article presents a qualitative analysis of all partly and wholly suspended sentences imposed in the Tasmanian Supreme Court over a two-year period. The importance of reasons for sentence is discussed and the relevance of a range of factors to the decision to suspend a sentence is considered. In particular, the discussion considers factors relating to the offender, for exampIe, prior record and youth; factors relating to the offence, especially where offences are committed in company; the response to the charges, such as cooperation with the authorities; and the effect of the offence and sanction, including hardship to the offender and others. In addition, cases which suggest an improper reasoning process was applied in exercising the discretion to suspend are reviewed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-62
    JournalUniversity of Tasmania Law Review
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'To Suspend or Not to Suspend: A Qualitative Analysis of Sentencing Decisions in the Supreme Court of Tasmania'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this