TY - GEN
T1 - Tournament versus fitness uniform selection
AU - Legg, Shane
AU - Hutter, Marcus
AU - Kumar, Akshat
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - In evolutionary algorithms a critical parameter that must be tuned is that of selection pressure. If it is set too low then the rate of convergence towards the optimum is likely to be slow. Alternatively if the selection pressure is set too high the system is likely to become stuck in a local optimum due to a loss of diversity in the population. The recent Fitness Uniform Selection Scheme (FUSS) is a conceptually simple but somewhat radical approach to addressing this problem - rather than biasing the selection towards higher fitness, FUSS biases selection towards sparsely populated fitness levels. In this paper we compare the relative performance of FUSS with the well known tournament selection scheme on a range of problems.
AB - In evolutionary algorithms a critical parameter that must be tuned is that of selection pressure. If it is set too low then the rate of convergence towards the optimum is likely to be slow. Alternatively if the selection pressure is set too high the system is likely to become stuck in a local optimum due to a loss of diversity in the population. The recent Fitness Uniform Selection Scheme (FUSS) is a conceptually simple but somewhat radical approach to addressing this problem - rather than biasing the selection towards higher fitness, FUSS biases selection towards sparsely populated fitness levels. In this paper we compare the relative performance of FUSS with the well known tournament selection scheme on a range of problems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344701819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 0780385152
SN - 9780780385153
T3 - Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004
SP - 2144
EP - 2151
BT - Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004
T2 - Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004
Y2 - 19 June 2004 through 23 June 2004
ER -