Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human-environment experiences

Andrew K. Palmer*, Mark Riley, Beth F.T. Brockett, Karl L. Evans, Laurence Jones, Sarah Clement

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As calls grow for relational approaches to nature and wellbeing research that consider reciprocity in human-environment interactions, the concept of affordances is gaining importance as a useful way of thinking about nature experiences. Affordances provide a framework to enable individualised conceptions of nature by focusing on what is functionally meaningful to people. However, affordance thinking is currently limited in its ability to help us understand how peoples' background, culture and circumstances shape interactions with nature - a critical issue with respect to inclusivity and the under-representation of some sections of society. Bourdieu's theory of practice is a well-established set of ‘thinking tools’ which potentially help addresses these influences. It examines how our social environment may pattern our practices, attitudes, and perceptions. In this paper, we review the various applications of affordances before providing an overview of how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can complement, and be integrated with, affordance thinking for novel applications to greenspace research. Bridging these areas of thinking will facilitate development of a more intersectional and complete understanding of nature experiences, including the quality and inclusivity of green and natural spaces.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere12723
    Pages (from-to)1-15
    Number of pages15
    JournalGeography Compass
    Volume17
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human-environment experiences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this