Research output per year
Research output per year
Marketta Hiissa*, Tapio Pahikkala, Hanna Suominen, Tuija Lehtikunnas, Barbro Back, Helena Karsten, Sanna Salanterä, Tapio Salakoski
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
Nursing narratives are an important part of patient documentation, but the possibilities to utilize them in the direct care process are limited due to the lack of proper tools. One solution to facilitate the utilization of narrative data could be to classify them according to their content. In this paper, we addressed two issues related to designing an automated classifier: domain experts' agreement on the content of the classes into which the data are to be classified, and the ability of the machine-learning algorithm to perform the classification on an acceptable level. The data we used were a set of Finnish intensive care nursing narratives. By using Cohen's κ, we assessed the agreement of three nurses on the content of the classes Breathing, Blood Circulation and Pain, and by using the area under ROC curve (AUC), we measured the ability of the Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) algorithm to learn the classification patterns of the nurses. On average, the values of κ were around 0.8. The agreement was highest in the class Blood Circulation, and lowest in the class Breathing. The LS-SVM algorithm was able to learn the classification patterns of the three nurses on an acceptable level; the values of AUC were generally around 0.85. Our results indicate that one way to develop electronic patient records could be tools that handle the free text in nursing documentation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Ubiquity: Technologies for Better Health in Aging Societies |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of MIE2006 |
Editors | Arie Hasman, Reinhold Haux, Johan van der Lei, Etienne De Clercq, Francis H. Roger-France |
Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 789-794 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-60750-192-3 |
ISBN (Print) | 1586036475, 978-1-58603-647-8 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 20th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE 2006 - Maastricht, Netherlands Duration: 27 Aug 2006 → 30 Aug 2006 https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/ubiquity-technologies-for-better-health-in-aging-societies (Conference Proceedings ) |
Name | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics |
---|---|
Volume | 124 |
ISSN (Print) | 0926-9630 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1879-8365 |
Conference | 20th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE 2006 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | MIE2006 |
Country/Territory | Netherlands |
City | Maastricht |
Period | 27/08/06 → 30/08/06 |
Other | Information technology helps to improve the quality of health care by disseminating and systematizing knowledge of diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities as well as the organization and management of care. Unobtrusive, active, non-invasive technologies, including wearable devices, allow us to continuously monitor and respond to changes in the health of a patient. Such devices range from micro-sensors integrated in textiles, through consumer electronics, to belt-worn personal computers with head mounted displays. Such ubiquitous computing allows us to identify new ways of managing care that promises to be considerably easier in letting patients maintain their good health while enjoying their life in their usual social setting, rather than having to spend much time at costly, dedicated health care facilities. It may prove essential for ensuring quality of life as well as health care for increasingly aging societies. In addition to the traditional topics of health and biomedical informatics, ‘Ubiquity: technologies for better health in aging societies’, a promising field for the future of health care, has been chosen as special topic for this publication of MIE2006. |
Internet address |
|
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review