TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards integrated management of Australia’s ecologically significant military training areas
AU - Zentelis, Rick
AU - Lindenmayer, David
AU - Roberts, J. Dale
AU - Dovers, Stephen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand Inc.
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - Military training areas (MTAs) in Australia are estimated to cover 2.3 per cent of the continent, or 18M hectares. Current Australian Defence Department policy requires that the values of MTAs be maintained by integrated land management (ILM), which can be defined as the assessment and balancing of competing demands to achieve optimal management of an area. We completed two evaluations of the Australian MTA management framework to determine whether it contained the key features of ILM. Phase 1 of this work involved a desktop study of whether: (1) there are clear management objectives for Australian MTAs that enable adaptive management; (2) the management framework is hierarchical allowing for management cohesion and integration; (3) elements of the hierarchy are consistent and have common objectives; and (4) there was dedicated funding. Phase 2 consisted of meetings with key Australian Department of Defence officials to discuss the operation of the MTA management framework. Our evaluation suggests that the Australian MTA management framework lacks key elements of ILM. Two major failings are a lack of clear, measurable management objectives negating the ability to implement adaptive management, and lack of a clear hierarchy of documentation, making coherent management impossible.
AB - Military training areas (MTAs) in Australia are estimated to cover 2.3 per cent of the continent, or 18M hectares. Current Australian Defence Department policy requires that the values of MTAs be maintained by integrated land management (ILM), which can be defined as the assessment and balancing of competing demands to achieve optimal management of an area. We completed two evaluations of the Australian MTA management framework to determine whether it contained the key features of ILM. Phase 1 of this work involved a desktop study of whether: (1) there are clear management objectives for Australian MTAs that enable adaptive management; (2) the management framework is hierarchical allowing for management cohesion and integration; (3) elements of the hierarchy are consistent and have common objectives; and (4) there was dedicated funding. Phase 2 consisted of meetings with key Australian Department of Defence officials to discuss the operation of the MTA management framework. Our evaluation suggests that the Australian MTA management framework lacks key elements of ILM. Two major failings are a lack of clear, measurable management objectives negating the ability to implement adaptive management, and lack of a clear hierarchy of documentation, making coherent management impossible.
KW - Military training areas
KW - adaptive management
KW - environmental management
KW - integrated land management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038378929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2017.1388194
DO - 10.1080/14486563.2017.1388194
M3 - Article
SN - 1448-6563
VL - 25
SP - 193
EP - 211
JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management
IS - 2
ER -