Abstract
An eventual sustained democratic transition process in Zimbabwe may include a 'truth and reconciliation' commission. The need for - and possible form of - any such institution is situated in a number of discussions: the balance of principle and pragmatism that peace deals sometimes require; comparative experiences in other societies and the promise and limits of institutional modelling; the dynamic between global expectations or prescriptions and ground-level exigencies; the interface of international criminal law and institutions with national-level justice processes; the content of the State's international legal duty to afford a remedy. In considering the extent of an international normative framework limiting the justice options of transitional States, a certain margin of appreciation may be appropriate or necessary to enable a society to reconcile with its violent past on its own terms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-117 |
| Number of pages | 45 |
| Journal | International and Comparative Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |