Abstract
The thesis that probabilities of conditionals are conditional probabilities has putatively been refuted many times by so-called 'triviality results', although it has also enjoyed a number of resurrections. In this paper I assault it yet again with a new such result. I begin by motivating the thesis and discussing some of the philosophical ramifications of its fluctuating fortunes. I will canvas various reasons, old and new, why the thesis seems plausible, and why we should care about its fate. I will look at some objections to Lewis's famous triviality results, and thus some reasons for the pursuit of further triviality results. I will generalize Lewis's results in ways that meet the objections. I will conclude with some reflections on the demise of the thesis-or otherwise.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-15 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Topoi |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2011 |