Trust, titmuss and blood

J. Shearmur

doi:10.1111/1468-0270.00272

Trust, titmuss and blood

J. Shearmur^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Richard Titmuss challenged the market-based approach to social problems in the case of blood supply. His criticisms can, however, be answered if a system of strict liability is in place and if commerce works effectively with charitable activity. It is false to draw a dichotomy between markets and narrow self-interest, on the one hand, and mechanisms that make for the well-being of others, on the other.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	29-33
Number of pages	5
Journal	Economic Affairs
Volume	21
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0270.00272
Publication status	Published - 2001

Access to Document

10.1111/1468-0270.00272

Cite this

@article{0718030a9f164310a58f3826b82eb742,

title = "Trust, titmuss and blood",

abstract = "Richard Titmuss challenged the market-based approach to social problems in the case of blood supply. His criticisms can, however, be answered if a system of strict liability is in place and if commerce works effectively with charitable activity. It is false to draw a dichotomy between markets and narrow self-interest, on the one hand, and mechanisms that make for the well-being of others, on the other.",

author = "J. Shearmur",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1111/1468-0270.00272",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "29--33",

journal = "Economic Affairs",

issn = "0265-0665",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust, titmuss and blood

AU - Shearmur, J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Richard Titmuss challenged the market-based approach to social problems in the case of blood supply. His criticisms can, however, be answered if a system of strict liability is in place and if commerce works effectively with charitable activity. It is false to draw a dichotomy between markets and narrow self-interest, on the one hand, and mechanisms that make for the well-being of others, on the other.

AB - Richard Titmuss challenged the market-based approach to social problems in the case of blood supply. His criticisms can, however, be answered if a system of strict liability is in place and if commerce works effectively with charitable activity. It is false to draw a dichotomy between markets and narrow self-interest, on the one hand, and mechanisms that make for the well-being of others, on the other.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035080281

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0270.00272

DO - 10.1111/1468-0270.00272

M3 - Article

SN - 0265-0665

VL - 21

SP - 29

EP - 33

JO - Economic Affairs

JF - Economic Affairs

IS - 1

ER -

Trust, titmuss and blood

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this