Truth and consequence in web campaigning: Is there an academic digital divide?

Rachel K. Gibson*, Andrea Römmele

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Use of the web by political parties and candidates as well as the general public is expanding. However, so far, little serious systematic analysis has taken place to examine the spread of the practice and particularly its consequences for electoral outcomes and voter attitudes. In this article, we identify some of the key reasons for the lack of attention to the 'cause-and-effect' questions about Web campaigning and highlight the empirical and theoretical reasons why academic study needs to do more to incorporate it into conventional election studies. We conclude by offering some guidelines for developing the tools and data that are needed for more 'joined-up' study of the subject to take place.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)273-287
    Number of pages15
    JournalEuropean Political Science
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Truth and consequence in web campaigning: Is there an academic digital divide?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this