Two-particle separation energies in the superdeformed well

A. N. Wilson*, A. Korichi, S. Siem, A. Astier, D. Bazzacco, P. Bednarczyk, M. H. Bergström, S. Chmel, D. M. Cullen, P. M. Davidson, A. Görgen, F. Hannachi, H. Hübel, N. Kintz, T. Lauritsen, A. Lopez-Martens, S. Lunardi, S. Naguleswaran, B. M. Nyakó, M. RejmundG. Schönwasser, C. Schück, J. F. Sharpey-Schafer, J. Timar, R. Wadsworth, J. Libert

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The location of nuclear closed shells, as evidenced through discontinuities in binding energy and one- and two-particle separation energy systematics, remains one of the simplest tests of global nuclear models. How shell gaps evolve, whether with increasing mass, increasing neutron:proton ratio or increasing deformation, is still uncertain, and it has recently been suggested that one must go beyond a static meanfield picture to include the effects of dynamic fluctuations in the nuclear shape even in the ground state. The identification of key properties which may distinguish between competing approaches is thus vital. Comparison of the binding energies of superdeformed nuclei in the A ≈ 190 region shows that two-proton separation energies are higher in the superdeformed state than in the normal state, despite the probably lower Coulomb barrier and lower total binding energy. Possible reasons for this difference are discussed. This somewhat counterintuitive result provides a critical test for global nuclear models.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number092065
    JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
    Volume312
    Issue numberSECTION 9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    EventInternational Nuclear Physics Conference 2010, INPC2010 - Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Duration: 4 Jul 20109 Jul 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two-particle separation energies in the superdeformed well'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this