Two Republican Traditions

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    The early nineteenth century saw the demise of the Italian-Atlantic tradition of republicanism and the rise of classical liberalism. A distinct Franco-German tradition of republicanism emerged from the time of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant, which differs from the older way of thinking associated with neo-republicanism. This chapter examines the key differences between the Italian-Atlantic and Franco-German traditions of republicanism and places them in a historical context. It first considers classical republicanism and how the ideological ideal of equal freedom as nondomination differs from the twin institutional ideals of a mixed constitution and a contestatory citizenry. It then looks at the classical liberal opposition that arose in response to Italian-Atlantic republicanism. It also discusses the views of Kant and Rousseau about freedom and the role of the citizenry, as well as their theory of the constitution. The absolutist opposition in Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes to the institutional ideals of republicanism is also explored.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRepublican Democracy Liberty, Law and Politics
    EditorsAndreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink
    Place of PublicationEdinburgh
    PublisherEdinburgh University Press
    Pages169-204
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9780748643066
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two Republican Traditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this