Abstract
Noel Pearson and Jon Altman are two of the central intellectual figures in the contemporary debate on how to address the poverty and disadvantage of Indigenous Australians living in remote regions. This article compares their visions for Indigenous economic development. Pearson advocates greater integration of Indigenous people into what he calls the ‘real economy’, but Altman has produced an alternative approach to Indigenous development – the ‘hybrid economy’ approach – which he suggests is more in keeping with the aspirations of many Aboriginal people to maintain a degree of autonomy from non-Indigenous Australians and to continue living close to ancestral lands. This article argues that both men should be understood as advocates for Indigenous self-determination, but different ways of conceptualising Indigenous autonomy and cultural survival has led them to contrasting policy positions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 412-426 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jul 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Two visions of Indigenous economic development and cultural survival: The ‘real economy’ and the ‘hybrid economy’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver