Two-year decline in vision but not hearing is associated with memory decline in very old adults in a population-based sample

Kaarin J. Anstey*, Mary A. Luszcz, Linnett Sanchez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent cross-sectional research in cognitive aging has demonstrated a robust association between visual acuity, auditory thresholds and cognitive performance in old age. However, the nature of the association is still unclear, particularly with respect to whether sensory and cognitive function are causally related. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether marked declines in performance on screening measures of either visual acuity or auditory thresholds have an effect on cognitive decline over 2 years. Methods: The sample from the Australian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 2,087) were assessed in 1992 and 1994 on measures of sensory and cognitive function as part of a larger clinical assessment. A quasi-experimental design involving comparison of extreme groups using repeated measures MANCOVA with age as a covariate was used. Results: Group performance on measures of hearing, memory, verbal ability and processing speed declined significantly. Decline in visual acuity had a significant effect on memory decline, but not on decline in verbal ability or processing speed. Decline in hearing was not associated with decline in any cognitive domain. Conclusion: The common association between visual acuity, auditory thresholds and cognitive function observed in cross-sectional studies appears to be disassociated in longitudinal studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-293
Number of pages5
JournalGerontology
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two-year decline in vision but not hearing is associated with memory decline in very old adults in a population-based sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this