Abstract
This column explores a recent health profession disciplinary case which throws light on the problems of unconventional interventions by medical practitioners under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Qld). The case involved "innovative" practices which were later found to have been scientifically unsupported, dangerous to patients and grounds for cancelling the health practitioner's registration. This column looks at common features of these kinds of cases in Australia and then examines recent attempts by the Medical Board of Australia to draft policy guidance around the use of unconventional practice in medicine. This column concludes with a number of changes to improve the effectiveness of the proposed policy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 574-589 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of law and medicine |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2020 |