Understanding and philosophical methodology

Magdalena Balcerak Jackson, Brendan Balcerak Jackson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to Conceptualism, philosophy is an independent discipline that can be pursued from the armchair because philosophy seeks truths that can be discovered purely on the basis of our understanding of expressions and the concepts they express. In his recent book, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Timothy Williamson argues that while philosophy can indeed be pursued from the armchair, we should reject any form of Conceptualism. In this paper, we show that Williamson's arguments against Conceptualism are not successful, and we sketch a way to understand understanding that shows that there is a clear sense in which we can indeed come to know the answers to (many) philosophical questions purely on the basis of understanding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-205
Number of pages21
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume161
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding and philosophical methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this