Unemployment and Crime: Toward Resolving the Paradox

Cezary A. Kapuscinski*, John Braithwaite, Bruce Chapman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While official crime statistics from many countries show that unemployed people have high crime rates and that communities with a lot of unemployment experience a lot of crime, this cross-sectional relationship is very often not found in time-series studies of unemployment and crime. In Australia there have been no individual-level or cross-sectional studies of unemployment and adult crime which have failed to find a positive relationship and no time-series which have supported a positive relationship. Consistent with this pattern, a time series of homicide from 1921 to 1987 in Australia reveals no significant unemployment effect. A theoretical resolution of this apparent paradox is advanced in terms of the effect of female employment on crime in a partriarchal society. Crime is posited as a function of both total unemployment and female employment. When female employment is added to the model, it has a strong positive effect on homicide, and unemployment also assumes a strong positive effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-243
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unemployment and Crime: Toward Resolving the Paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this