Unfinished business: Re-positioning gender on the education equity agenda

Judith Gill*, Deborah Tranter

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)


    The long-standing relationship between social disadvantage and poor educational outcomes continues to preoccupy educational policy-makers, with teachers at the front line of the ongoing struggle. Across the range of equity concerns, gender may be noted as either qualifying disadvantage or compounding it, but the meaning of gender as a simple binary category is rarely challenged. Using data drawn from a study in three disadvantaged urban fringe Australian high schools we argue that the policy-driven gender-as-difference approach can serve to mask educational inequality rather than to challenge it. By demonstrating the ways in which the girls and their teachers respond to, interpret and understand their schooling experience, we suggest the enriched capacity of a relational theory of gender that, while inclusive of earlier theoretical moments and cognisant of progress made, does offer a more coherent and potentially redemptive basis for educational intervention.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)278-295
    Number of pages18
    JournalBritish Journal of Sociology of Education
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014


    Dive into the research topics of 'Unfinished business: Re-positioning gender on the education equity agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this