Using empirical models of species colonization under multiple threatening processes to identify complementary threat-mitigation strategies

Ayesha Tulloch, Alessio Mortelliti, Geoffrey Kay, Daniel Florance, David Lindenmayer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Approaches to prioritize conservation actions are gaining popularity. However, limited empirical evidence exists on which species might benefit most from threat mitigation and on what combination of threats, if mitigated simultaneously, would result in the best outcomes for biodiversity. We devised a way to prioritize threat mitigation at a regional scale with empirical evidence based on predicted changes to population dynamicsinformation that is lacking in most threat-management prioritization frameworks that rely on expert elicitation. We used dynamic occupancy models to investigate the effects of multiple threats (tree cover, grazing, and presence of an hyperaggressive competitor, the Noisy Miner (Manorina melanocephala) on bird-population dynamics in an endangered woodland community in southeastern Australia. The 3 threatening processes had different effects on different species. We used predicted patch-colonization probabilities to estimate the benefit to each species of removing one or more threats. We then determined the complementary set of threat-mitigation strategies that maximized colonization of all species while ensuring that redundant actions with little benefit were avoided. The single action that resulted in the highest colonization was increasing tree cover, which increased patch colonization by 5% and 11% on average across all species and for declining species, respectively. Combining Noisy Miner control with increasing tree cover increased species colonization by 10% and 19% on average for all species and for declining species respectively, and was a higher priority than changing grazing regimes. Guidance for prioritizing threat mitigation is critical in the face of cumulative threatening processes. By incorporating population dynamics in prioritization of threat management, our approach helps ensure funding is not wasted on ineffective management programs that target the wrong threats or species.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)867-882
    JournalConservation Biology
    Volume30
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Using empirical models of species colonization under multiple threatening processes to identify complementary threat-mitigation strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this