Using system archetypes for problem framing and a qualitative analysis: A case study in Iranian water resource management

F. Zare*, A. Bagheri, S. Elsawah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sustainable decision making about water resources needs contextual understanding and analysis of water resources systems. A systemic approach provides a holistic understanding of issues and facilitates conceptualizing of the problems. Applying the archetype lenses to look into water resource problems in Gorganroud-Gharesu basin, we found out the overall dynamics of the problem can be explained using some archetypes, mainly: limits to growth, attractiveness principle, fixes that fail and shifting the burden. The Gorganroud-Gharesu Basin is located in Iran in the eastern part of the southern Caspian Sea (Figure 1). The climate is mild and the annual precipitation ranges from 250 to 450 mm, with easterly regions receiving the most rain. The basin area is 13935 Km2, 60 percent of it is mountainous and the rest is plains (Samareh Hashemi et al., 2014). The main economic sectors in Gorganroud-Gharesu are agriculture, services and industry. The Gorganroud-Gharesu Basin has several problems and each of them has different socioeconomic and environmental impacts. The main problem faced by the Gorganroud-Gharesu Basin is the lack of an integrated management in the face of growing demand. Water management in the basin is based on short-term responses to the problem without paying attention to the consequences. In other words, despite building four large dams and thousands of wells to meet water demands, the problem comes back more intense each time after a while of meeting previous demand. Also, the number of floods and their damage increased dramatically in the past decades. By investigating the Gorganroud-Gharesu basin’s issues and problems, its systemic archetypes were recognized based on facts and data. The story of archetypes started when the growth of industrial, agriculture and services sectors is threated or limited by not having enough water, this fail has been fixed by making dams and wells and provide more water, unfortunately more supply gives the wrong message to consumers of having sufficient water and lead to encouraging more consumption and problems will continue. The first step to breaking the dynamics of an archetype is to recognize them, their causes and consequences. The system archetypes serve as the means for gaining insights into the underlying system structures from which the archetypal behaviours emerge. This research facilitates conceptualization the model and developing the preliminary dynamic hypothesis for the next step.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM 2017
EditorsGeoff Syme, Darla Hatton MacDonald, Beth Fulton, Julia Piantadosi
PublisherModelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc (MSSANZ)
Pages1433-1439
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780987214379
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Managing Cumulative Risks through Model-Based Processes, MODSIM 2017 - Held jointly with the 25th National Conference of the Australian Society for Operations Research and the DST Group led Defence Operations Research Symposium, DORS 2017 - Hobart, Australia
Duration: 3 Dec 20178 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameProceedings - 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM 2017

Conference

Conference22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Managing Cumulative Risks through Model-Based Processes, MODSIM 2017 - Held jointly with the 25th National Conference of the Australian Society for Operations Research and the DST Group led Defence Operations Research Symposium, DORS 2017
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityHobart
Period3/12/178/12/17

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using system archetypes for problem framing and a qualitative analysis: A case study in Iranian water resource management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this