Variability in impression formation: Investigating the role of motivation, capacity, and the categorization process

Katherine J. Reynolds*, Penelope J. Oakes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    36 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Current theory and research suggests that stereotyping is inversely related to the allocation of attentional resources. For example, motivational factors (e.g., interdependence, accuracy goals) are argued to increase attentional investment and encourage individuation. Within this model, a neglected feature of the impression formation process is the role of the perceivers' own self-definition. Based on self-categorization theory, it is argued that whether the salient self-other categorization is defined in interpersonal or group terms, respectively, will determine whether impressions will be more individuated or stereotypic. Two experiments are reported where the effect of interdependence (Experiment 1) and accuracy goals (Experiment 2) as well as the salient comparative context (interpersonal, intergroup) on impression formation were investigated. The results suggest that the nature of self-other categorizations does play a significant role in explaining variability in impression formation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)355-373
    Number of pages19
    JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Variability in impression formation: Investigating the role of motivation, capacity, and the categorization process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this