Variation in the oxygen isotope ratio of phloem sap sucrose from castor bean. Evidence in support of the peclet effect

Margaret M. Barbour, Ulrich Schurr, Beverley K. Henry, S. Chin Wong, Graham D. Farquhar*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    141 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Theory suggests that the level of enrichment of 18O above source water in plant organic material (Δ) may provide an integrative indicator of control of water loss. However, there are still gaps in our understanding of the processes affecting Δ. One such gap is the observed discrepancy between molded enrichment of water at the sites of evaporation within the leaf and measured enrichment of the leaf water as a whole (Δ(L)). Farquhar and Lloyd (1993) suggested that this may be caused by a Peclet effect. It is also unclear whether organic material formed in the leaf reflects enrichment of water at the sites of evaporation within the leaf or Δ(L). To investigate this question castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) leaves, still attached to the plant, were sealed into a controlled-environment gas exchange chamber and subjected to a step change in leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference. Sucrose was collected from a cut on the petiole of the leaf in the chamber under equilibrium conditions and every hour for 6 h after the change in leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference. Oxygen isotope composition of sucrose in the phloem sap (Δ(suc)) reflected modeled Δ(L). A model is presented describing Δ(suc) at isotopic steady state, and accounts for 96% of variation in measured Δ(suc). The data strongly support the Peclet effect theory.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)671-679
    Number of pages9
    JournalPlant Physiology
    Volume123
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Variation in the oxygen isotope ratio of phloem sap sucrose from castor bean. Evidence in support of the peclet effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this