Varieties of governance versatility and institutions: Comparing the governance of primary care performance in six jurisdictions

Viola Burau*, Tim Tenbensel, Jean Louis Denis, Helen Dickinson, Karen Gardner, Peter Groenewegen, Ellen Kuhlmann

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research on governance often assumes that governance requires combinations of hierarchical, market and network co-ordination. However, governance versatility – understood as the existence of a repertoire of different modes of coordination – is not a characteristic of all instances of governance. The aim of this paper is to offer a more thorough analysis by exploring existing levels of governance versatility and how these are influenced by institutional profiles. Our comparative study of primary care performance across six jurisdictions suggests that higher levels of governance versatility can be shaped by very different institutional profiles. Our analysis raises important questions for future studies of governance versatility.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)214-236
    Number of pages23
    JournalPublic Policy and Administration
    Volume39
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Varieties of governance versatility and institutions: Comparing the governance of primary care performance in six jurisdictions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this