TY - JOUR
T1 - Vertical profiles, boundary layer budgets, and regional flux estimates for CO2 and its 13C/12C ratio and for water vapor above a forest/bog mosaic in central Siberia
AU - Lloyd, Jon
AU - Francey, Roger J.
AU - Mollicone, Danilo
AU - Raupach, Michael R.
AU - Sogachev, Andrej
AU - Arneth, Almut
AU - Byers, John N.
AU - Kelliher, Francis M.
AU - Rebmann, Corinna
AU - Valentini, Riccardo
AU - Wong, S. Chin
AU - Bauer, Guntram
AU - Schulze, E. Detlef
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - On July 15 and 16, 1996, profiles of temperature, water vapor, carbon dioxide concentration, and its carbon isotopic composition were made within and above the convective boundary layer (CBL), near the village of Zotino in central Siberia (60°N, 89°E). On both days the CBL grew to a height of around 1000 m at midday after which little further growth was observed. This was despite high rates of sensible heat flux into the CBL from the predominantly coniferous vegetation below and was attributable to a high subsidence velocity. For all flights, marked discontinuities across the top of the CBL were observed for water vapor and CO2 concentrations with differences between the CBL and the free troposphere above being as high as 10 mmol mol-1 and 13 μmol mol-1, respectively. Associated with the lower CO2 concentrations within the CBL was an enrichment of the δ 13C in CO2 of up to 0.7‰. Although for any one flight, fluctuations in CO2 and δ 13C within the CBL were small (less than 3 μmol mol-1 and 0.1‰); they were well correlated and suggested a photosynthetic discrimination, Δ, by the vegetation below of ∼17‰. Estimates of regional Δ based on CBL budgeting techniques suggested values ranging from 14.8 to 20.4‰. CBL budgeting techniques were also used to estimates regional ecosystem carbon fluxes (-3 to -9 μmol m -2 s-1) and evaporation rates (1-3 mmol m -2 s-1). Agreement with ground-based tower measurements was reasonable, but a bootstrap error analysis suggested that errors associated with the integral CBL technique were sometimes unacceptably large, especially for estimates of regional photosynthetic 13C discrimination and regional evaporation rates. Conditions under which CBL techniques should result in reasonably accurate estimations of regional fluxes and isotopic fractionations are evaluated.
AB - On July 15 and 16, 1996, profiles of temperature, water vapor, carbon dioxide concentration, and its carbon isotopic composition were made within and above the convective boundary layer (CBL), near the village of Zotino in central Siberia (60°N, 89°E). On both days the CBL grew to a height of around 1000 m at midday after which little further growth was observed. This was despite high rates of sensible heat flux into the CBL from the predominantly coniferous vegetation below and was attributable to a high subsidence velocity. For all flights, marked discontinuities across the top of the CBL were observed for water vapor and CO2 concentrations with differences between the CBL and the free troposphere above being as high as 10 mmol mol-1 and 13 μmol mol-1, respectively. Associated with the lower CO2 concentrations within the CBL was an enrichment of the δ 13C in CO2 of up to 0.7‰. Although for any one flight, fluctuations in CO2 and δ 13C within the CBL were small (less than 3 μmol mol-1 and 0.1‰); they were well correlated and suggested a photosynthetic discrimination, Δ, by the vegetation below of ∼17‰. Estimates of regional Δ based on CBL budgeting techniques suggested values ranging from 14.8 to 20.4‰. CBL budgeting techniques were also used to estimates regional ecosystem carbon fluxes (-3 to -9 μmol m -2 s-1) and evaporation rates (1-3 mmol m -2 s-1). Agreement with ground-based tower measurements was reasonable, but a bootstrap error analysis suggested that errors associated with the integral CBL technique were sometimes unacceptably large, especially for estimates of regional photosynthetic 13C discrimination and regional evaporation rates. Conditions under which CBL techniques should result in reasonably accurate estimations of regional fluxes and isotopic fractionations are evaluated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844381571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/1999GB001211
DO - 10.1029/1999GB001211
M3 - Article
SN - 0886-6236
VL - 15
SP - 267
EP - 284
JO - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
JF - Global Biogeochemical Cycles
IS - 2
ER -