Virtual world café method for identifying mental health research priorities: Methodological case study

Michelle Banfield*, Amelia Gulliver, Alyssa R. Morse

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    People with lived experience of mental health problems as both consumers and carers can bring significant expertise to the research process. However, the methods used to gather this information and their subsequent results can vary markedly. This paper describes the methods for two virtual World Cafés held to gather data on consumer and carer priorities for mental health research. Several methodological processes and challenges arose during data collection, including the achieved recruitment for each group (n = 4, n = 7) falling significantly short of the target number of 20 participants per group. This led to departures from planned methods (i.e., the use of a single ‘room’, rather than multiple breakout rooms). Despite this, the participants in the virtual World Cafés were able to generate over 200 ideas for research priorities, but not identify agreed-upon priorities. Virtual World Cafés can quickly generate a significant volume of data; however, they may not be as effective at generating consensus.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number291
    JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Virtual world café method for identifying mental health research priorities: Methodological case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this