Visual Decision Aids: Improving Laypeople’s Understanding of Forensic Science Evidence

Gianni Ribeiro*, Helena Likwornik, Jason M. Chin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Forensic science plays an important role in the criminal justice system; however, research and miscarriages of justice have demonstrated that laypeople can easily misunderstand the results of forensic tests. Given the importance of these test results, interdisciplinary oversight groups have called for a clearer expression of forensic tests’ corresponding error rates. Meanwhile, a large body of research in the medical domain suggests that visual decision aids can improve understanding of statistical information. Seeking to apply decision aids to the forensic domain, we present three preregistered experiments (N = 879) demonstrating that visual decision aids may indeed improve understanding of forensic science evidence. A mini meta-analysis across the three experiments comparing control conditions to visual aids demonstrated a medium effect size of g = 0.35. Therefore, decision aids represent a promising, easy-to-implement way to improve laypeople’s understanding of forensic science evidence, thereby potentially preventing associated miscarriages of justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-240
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visual Decision Aids: Improving Laypeople’s Understanding of Forensic Science Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this