TY - JOUR
T1 - Vitamin D in Dialysis
T2 - Defining Deficiency and Rationale for Supplementation
AU - Singer, Richard Francis
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Vitamin D status is determined by the serum concentration of one of its metabolites, 25-hydroxy-D. Defining vitamin D deficiency based on its classical roles in gut calcium absorption and bone mineralization is problematic in dialysis patients and, until recently, was ignored in the nephrology literature. The newly recognized nonclassical functions of vitamin D include effects on the immune system, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The nonclassical effects are likely to be equally relevant in the dialysis population, but suffer from a lack of strong evidence on which to base therapeutic targets. Past medical opinion in the nondialysis population warned that higher dose vitamin D supplementation may be toxic and was unnecessary. This is because older supplementation recommendations were based on early twentieth century studies using cod-liver oil to treat rickets. The clinical resolution of rickets requires a relatively low dose of vitamin D. Current vitamin D guidelines generally target higher 25-hydroxy-D levels of 30ng/ml, based on optimizing markers of bone health. This results in very high estimates of 50-100% for the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in dialysis patients. This review examines the relevance of data on the classical and nonclassical effects of vitamin D in dialysis patients. An evidence-based dosing regimen for use in dialysis patients is suggested to safely and reliably achieve vitamin D sufficiency.
AB - Vitamin D status is determined by the serum concentration of one of its metabolites, 25-hydroxy-D. Defining vitamin D deficiency based on its classical roles in gut calcium absorption and bone mineralization is problematic in dialysis patients and, until recently, was ignored in the nephrology literature. The newly recognized nonclassical functions of vitamin D include effects on the immune system, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The nonclassical effects are likely to be equally relevant in the dialysis population, but suffer from a lack of strong evidence on which to base therapeutic targets. Past medical opinion in the nondialysis population warned that higher dose vitamin D supplementation may be toxic and was unnecessary. This is because older supplementation recommendations were based on early twentieth century studies using cod-liver oil to treat rickets. The clinical resolution of rickets requires a relatively low dose of vitamin D. Current vitamin D guidelines generally target higher 25-hydroxy-D levels of 30ng/ml, based on optimizing markers of bone health. This results in very high estimates of 50-100% for the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in dialysis patients. This review examines the relevance of data on the classical and nonclassical effects of vitamin D in dialysis patients. An evidence-based dosing regimen for use in dialysis patients is suggested to safely and reliably achieve vitamin D sufficiency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872978587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/sdi.12010
DO - 10.1111/sdi.12010
M3 - Review article
SN - 0894-0959
VL - 26
SP - 40
EP - 46
JO - Seminars in Dialysis
JF - Seminars in Dialysis
IS - 1
ER -