Abstract
This article examines commercial and regulatory litigation in the High Court since Robert French was appointed Chief Justice in 2008. An analysis of six cases reveals a spectrum of valour and caution, courage and coyness. The French High Court has asserted judicial leadership and a public responsiveness in some areas but in others it has retreated to a narrow incrementalism that pulls away from broader issues and leaves important questions unanswered. Although the article concludes that it is too early to determine a particular judicial method of the French High Court (as compared to some of its predecessors), it raises questions about what should be expected of Australia�s highest appellate court in this area.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 111-130 |
Journal | Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice |
Volume | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |