Abstract
This article examines commercial and regulatory litigation in the High Court since Robert French was appointed Chief Justice in 2008. An analysis of six cases reveals a spectrum of valour and caution, courage and coyness. The French High Court has asserted judicial leadership and a public responsiveness in some areas but in others it has retreated to a narrow incrementalism that pulls away from broader issues and leaves important questions unanswered. Although the article concludes that it is too early to determine a particular judicial method of the French High Court (as compared to some of its predecessors), it raises questions about what should be expected of Australia�s highest appellate court in this area.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-130 |
| Journal | Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice |
| Volume | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Wavering alternations of valour and caution: Commercial and regulatory litigation in the French CJ High Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver