Abstract
During Timor-Leste's political and security crisis in 2006, a seemingly latent regional division re-emerged between Timorese from its eastern region, lorosa'e, and those from its western region, loromonu. The conflict between lorosa'e and loromonu revealed critical weaknesses in nation-building. Only four years after independence in 2002, international peacekeeping forces, led by Australia, were redeployed to the new nation-state. This article argues that the enduring political significance of regionalism weakens nation-building in Timor-Leste. This case study revitalises traditional security paradigms by relocating identity-building from the periphery of nation-building to its centre. Identity-building supports the formation of a unifying national political community which transcends social divisions within post-conflict societies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-70 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Southeast Asian Studies |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '''We have resisted, now we must build'': Regionalism and nation-building in Timor-Leste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver