What can a trial contribute to the debate about supervised injecting rooms?

Gabriele Bammer

doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00147.x

What can a trial contribute to the debate about supervised injecting rooms?

Gabriele Bammer^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Outlines the areas for evaluation of supervised injecting rooms, the limitations of any evaluation and how the evaluation results can be buttressed against misuse. Argues that forceful advocacy for the role of evaluation in political decision-making is needed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	214-215
Number of pages	2
Journal	Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume	24
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00147.x
Publication status	Published - 2000

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00147.x

Cite this

@article{c3ece4e2a74149bfa2650b9de1f671b2,

title = "What can a trial contribute to the debate about supervised injecting rooms?",

abstract = "Outlines the areas for evaluation of supervised injecting rooms, the limitations of any evaluation and how the evaluation results can be buttressed against misuse. Argues that forceful advocacy for the role of evaluation in political decision-making is needed.",

author = "Gabriele Bammer",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00147.x",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "214--215",

journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",

issn = "1326-0200",